Popular articles

Four principles of strategic stability

It is possible, at least conceptually, to sketch out a set of broad principles for U.S-Russian strategic stability – those principles are rooted in Cold War legacies but need to be adapted, revisited, and broadened in light of changing strategic capabilities a...

On October 20, 2018, President Donald Trump announced that the United States is going to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF Treaty). Many experts assumed that that Trump’s decision was caused not by the accusations that Russia violated the treaty but by concerns about Ch...

In the aftermath of the Second Session of the Preparatory Committee for the 2020 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), its Chair Ambassador Adam Bugajski of the Republic of Poland gave an exclusive interview to the Yaderny Kontrol bulletin ...

All articles


Did you enjoy the article?

Global Trends, Today’s Bizarre Geopolitics, and What It Means for Russia and the World

Vladimir Orlov

A century after the First World War began, Europe – in a broader meaning of a Euro-Atlantic space from Vancouver to Vladivostok – and its security are now shaken by the New Cold War. It is a bizarre cold war as the bipolar world order – the type of world order accustomed to cold war – was gone 25 years ago. It is a new era of multistakeholder-cold-war.

The fact it is bizarre does not make it less dangerous than the “traditional” cold war of the past. Finally, the same actors as 25 years ago still have nukes. Unlike 25 years ago, though, they have most sophisticated types of lethal and non-lethal weapons. This cold war is not just a post-Ukraine-crisis hangover episode. We should get prepared for a long, shaky and chilly period of political instability and conflict.


Full text of the article


Security Index No. 2 (107) Spring 2014